Waste management and Recycling


Waste is a first world problem. Materialism and consumerism have overtaken care for the environment, and buying more than we need has become a social norm. In this article, we explore waste generation and management, with an eye on high-income countries. How much waste is produced each year?
waste production per capita OECD
A person living in an OECD country consumes on average about 15 tonnes of materials per year, which is higher than in other world regions (~12 tonnes per person). The highest material intensity per capita within OECD is the United States.
waste, material productivity
Since 2000, the vast majority of OECD countries have experienced improvements in material productivity, that is, the revenue generated per unit of waste. Today, OECD countries generate on average USD $2600 per tonne of materials consumed, compared to USD $1700 per tonne in 2000. This reflects a general improvement in the efficiency of production processes and the substitution of domestic production with imports.The map below shows us that OECD countries (like the US, Australia, and European countries) have a higher waste generated per capita than developing countries.
waste per capita map
Now, let’s look at the waste generated per capita each year in different OECD countries. Their citizens generate 506 kg on average per year. That is equivalent to more than 1000 pairs of shoes thrown out by each person each year. So the question everyone is asking is…Types of Waste Management:

  • Landfill
  • Incineration with/ without energy recovery
  • Composting
  • Recycling

Here’s a quick look at how waste has been managed globally over the last 25 years.


historical global waste treatment profiles


In the last two decades or so, more waste is being diverted from landfills and incinerators and fed back into the economy through recycling, composting and incineration with energy recovery.

“Proper” waste management is being heralded by a few countries, while others like the US lag behind.


recovered waste by country


As you may have noticed in the “Note” in the figure legend above, recovered waste includes incineration and composting. Let’s take a closer look at the waste disposal profiles below.


Waste management profiles, waste fate


Many of the countries who have eliminated landfills from their process have switched to incineration (red). Incinerators can decrease the quantity of waste by 95% and allows better management of odour and noise in comparison to landfill. For incinerators that incorporate waste to energy, it creates another opportunity for generating heat or electricity. For example, Sweden generates 8% of its heating needs from waste incinerators.

But is incineration the best substitute for landfilling? How efficient is converting waste to energy?


Recycling versus VS incineration energy efiiciency


Let’s have a comparison between the energy conserved by recycling (blue) and incineration with energy recovery (pink). Turns out, except for rubber tires, energy saved from incineration of most materials is not really as efficient as that of recycling.

Moreover, incineration emits smoke and ash, including acid gases, dioxin and nitrogen oxide that are  harmful to both the environment and humans.

In a nutshell, transformation from landfilling to incineration has some advantages, but unfortunately not enough to offset our ecological footprints. This trend of upward transformation of waste management will have to continue in order to sustain our natural resources and energy.

So, it is great news that recycling is on the rise but it is important to look at the true effectiveness of this practice.

The Benefits of Recycling

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, recycling:

  • Aluminium cans save 95% of the energy needed to make new cans from raw materials;
  • recycling steel and tin cans saves 60 to 74%;
  • recycling paper saves about 60%; and
  • recycling plastic and glass saves about 30%

In fact, the energy saved by recycling one glass bottle will operate a 100-watt light bulb for four hours.

Recycling Myths

Unfortunately, recycling in certain places become myths as some of the plastics intended for recycling still end up in landfills or even disposed into oceans.

In most countries, some share of plastics intended for recycling are eventually rejected at local or regional waste handling facilities because of contamination and the lack of economic incentive.

Depending on recycling policies, targets, infrastructure and efficiency of recycling separation methods, the rate of rejected recycling can vary significantly between countries.


Recycling per capita


From collection to sorting to reprocessing, recycling is a multi-component process.


recycling process


It requires the cooperation of various parties to work, including people who are willing to recycle, recycling manufacturers, companies willing to produce goods from recycled materials, and consumers who drive the demand for products made from green materials. The line breaks if any one party does not participate.

This means everyone, including you, makes up a key factor for improving the efficiency of recycling.

What can you do to help?

A common mistake is thinking that all plastics are recyclable when there are more varieties than you’d think. Educating yourself and those around you is the first step. Next, small efforts like cleaning your plastic waste avoid it being discarded for “contamination”.


which plastics are recyclable


Ultimately, as consumers, we can create financial incentives for everyone to buy into the recycling process by purchasing recycled goods.

This article was written by Emily Victoria Lu and Owen Mulhern.


This article originally appeared on Earth.Org and is republished here as part of an editorial agreement.


English flagEnglish

English flagDeutsch Chinese flag中文
Get sample

    Upon receiving your request we will get in contact with you about the order details.